dansotelojr

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 5,049 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Someone bought Dorrington? #3117
    allen
    Participant

    deleted – duplicate post……

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by allen.
    in reply to: Someone bought Dorrington? #3116
    mtndad
    Participant

    Frog Jump is doable,

    It takes 30 days after posting before you can sell liquor.

    Plenty of time.

    in reply to: Someone bought Dorrington? #3115
    skisnxs
    Participant

    Not sure about license status but I talked with the new proprietor and they are shooting to be open by Frog Jump weekend.

    in reply to: Tree trimming/removal #3114
    Karocker
    Participant

    I have had great success with A1 tree service in Murphy’s 736-6786. They also had the best pricing.
    http://www.a-1treeserviceinc.com

    in reply to: Yard Waste Disposal 2015 #3113
    Dogwood
    Participant

    Any information on where I can drop off needles and trimmings would be great. I have used the miller yard but another location/option would be great.

    in reply to: Tree trimming/removal #3112
    guyo
    Participant

    The number I have for Jason Roland is 768-8733.

    in reply to: Calaveras County General Plan #3111
    carlshome
    Participant

    dpalme,

    I agree, statutes live forever, so it is important to act now.

    I shared my concerns about this plan with friend who is a long time real estate agent in Arnold. She was also unaware of the proposed changes to the General Plan. The post card I received noted that the plan was made public in December 2014. But it took the county three months for me to receive notification. That would be ok, except the deadline for comments is March 20th. It makes me wonder how many people in the county are aware of these proposed changes that may affect their properties.

    Fingers crossed the County adds the language to protect owners of per-existing legal un-improved lots.

    Carl

    in reply to: Calaveras County General Plan #3110
    dpalme
    Participant

    Happy to be of help, Carl.

    Personnel come and go, but statutes never seem to die. And if we ever do decide to sell (lot, home or both), it’s easier to just be able to point to the General Plan.

    And thank you for taking the time to start this thread. To be honest, I’d not have done the digging if you’d not brought it up.

    in reply to: Calaveras County General Plan #3109
    carlshome
    Participant

    Thank you deplame for the research and further information. I too have a lot which is undeveloped. I will follow your lead and write an email to the County Planning Commission asking that they clarify land use of pre-existing legal lots.

    in reply to: Tree trimming/removal #3108
    mtndad
    Participant

    I suggest Dave Finn. 795-7649. He takes care of all paper work and is insured.
    Although, I’m not sure he is doing oaks. I’m sure he will recommend someone if he doesn’t.

    in reply to: Cabin Maintenance #3107
    vnj
    Participant

    It has been over four years since we had a tall dead tree removed. We think the gentleman’s name was Jason Rolands or something close to that. Currently our insurance company wants some large branches removed from the old oak tree that in places overhangs our roof. Does anyone know how to contact Jason? Alternatively does someone have a recommendation for someone to trim some LARGE branches that overhang our roof. We would like it to be done by someone who not only takes care of the insurance company’s concerns but also maintains the beauty of the tree.

    in reply to: Calaveras County General Plan #3106
    dpalme
    Participant

    I called the Planning Department today to ask about development/rezoning of pre-existing lots in the BTV subdivision (as we have one).

    Per the woman with whom I spoke, BTV will fall under the Residential Low-Density designation. That said, as long as the lot is a pre-existing, *legal* lot, the change in zone will not affect the ability to develop. There is a statute that allows for a single-family dwelling to be sited and for a perc test to be done to confirm septic suitability. So, as long as the lot tests ok for percolation, development would be allowed.

    (For those following along, the questionable language is in the Land Use Element section, Page LU4. You can find that here: http://bos.calaverasgov.us/Portals/bos/Docs/BCC_SupplementalDocs/Planning_Commission/General%20Plan/2%20Land%20Use%2012-18-14.pdf)

    The contradictory language is in defining the density for lots that have public water AND public sewer (<1 acre ok for development) and those that have public water and septic/OSWT) (min 1 acre), the latter being what we have here in BTV.

    So, reassurances aside, I wrote an email to the Planning Commission requesting that the language be clarified regarding pre-existing legal lots such as ours. Not that we intend to build, or even sell off, but it’d be reassuring to have the right language in the General Plan.

    in reply to: BigTrees Talk #3105
    JD
    Participant

    Has anyone any information regarding the rumor that Brian Rowley may open his yard waste drop-off site for a short period of time this year?

    in reply to: Someone bought Dorrington? #3104
    mtndad
    Participant

    I hope I am wrong, but looking today at the ABC home page and then to On-Sale licenses, no mention of the Lube Room. (Lube Room surrendered) .

    Also, same search, New application report for March 12, the Lube Room is not mentioned.

    If there is a site where we can get more information, I would like to know it.

    http://www.abc.ca.gov/datport/SubDlyNuRep.asp?p_sort=mailing
    http://www.abc.ca.gov/datport/AHCityRep.asp

    in reply to: Calaveras County General Plan #3103
    caleach
    Participant

    Sounds like lawyer-speak to me. Sorry if any of you are lawyers but really seems like they are being intentionally ambiguous.
    Steve

Viewing 15 posts - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 5,049 total)